Last edited by Zulkikazahn
Wednesday, May 6, 2020 | History

3 edition of structure of legal argument and proof found in the catalog.

structure of legal argument and proof

J. S. Covington

structure of legal argument and proof

by J. S. Covington

  • 394 Want to read
  • 27 Currently reading

Published by John Marshall Pub. Co. in Houston, Tex .
Written in English

    Places:
  • United States.
    • Subjects:
    • Trial practice -- United States.,
    • Evidence (Law) -- United States.,
    • Logic.

    • Edition Notes

      Includes bibliographical references and index.

      Other titlesLegal argument and proof.
      StatementJ.S. Covington, Jr.
      Classifications
      LC ClassificationsKF8915 .C64 1993
      The Physical Object
      Paginationxxviii, 415 p. :
      Number of Pages415
      ID Numbers
      Open LibraryOL1444051M
      ISBN 100916081095
      LC Control Number93079684
      OCLC/WorldCa29374916

      The teleological or physico-theological argument, also known as the argument from design, or intelligent design argument is an argument for the existence of God or, more generally, for an intelligent creator based on perceived evidence of "intelligent design" in the natural world.. The earliest recorded versions of this argument are associated with Socrates in ancient Greece, although it has. The legal concept of evidence is neither static nor universal. Medieval understandings of evidence in the age of trial by ordeal would be quite alien to modern sensibilities (Ho –) and there is no approach to evidence and proof that is shared by all legal systems of the world today.

      Contents Preface vii Introduction viii I Fundamentals 1. Sets 3 IntroductiontoSets 3 TheCartesianProduct 8 Subsets 11 PowerSets 14 Union,Intersection,Difference 17File Size: 1MB.   Home | Previous | Next Principles of Clear Writing 1. Write in the active voice. The active voice eliminates confusion by forcing you to name the actor in a sentence. This construction makes clear to the reader who is to perform the duty. The passive voice makes sentences longer and roundabout. Who is responsible is much less obvious. Passive verbs have a form of the verb tomust: imposes obligation, indicates a necessity to act.

      Keywords: Argument structure; Argument graphs; Argument evaluation; Argumentation schemes; Burden of proof; Proof standards; Legal argument 1. Introduction This article presents a functional model of the evaluation of commonsense arguments, taking seriously the proce- dural and dialogical aspects of Cited by: But it's a fine start: it helps build confidence for students that are new to legal writing. Regarding 'legal reasoning," this book makes a good case that writing helps a person understand what they think, and thus by forcing the writer into multiple drafts of writing, the writer is a more disciplined thinker/5.


Share this book
You might also like
Fair, Square, and Legal

Fair, Square, and Legal

Food and diet, 1890-1910.

Food and diet, 1890-1910.

Mazel tov, yall

Mazel tov, yall

An investigation of the doctrine of Baron Swedenborg, or of the church called, New Jerusalem

An investigation of the doctrine of Baron Swedenborg, or of the church called, New Jerusalem

Meteorology for seamen

Meteorology for seamen

Macroeconomics

Macroeconomics

The Manchester United story

The Manchester United story

Independence or co-partnership in education.

Independence or co-partnership in education.

Wool quality

Wool quality

D.H. Lawrence: Sons and lovers,

D.H. Lawrence: Sons and lovers,

Termination of the Treaty of 1832 Between the U.S. and Russia

Termination of the Treaty of 1832 Between the U.S. and Russia

Big Cypress

Big Cypress

Thomas Carlyle

Thomas Carlyle

Biographical dictionary of modern European radicals and socialists

Biographical dictionary of modern European radicals and socialists

Bowdon and Dunham Massey

Bowdon and Dunham Massey

Structure of legal argument and proof by J. S. Covington Download PDF EPUB FB2

Additional Physical Format: Online version: Covington, J.S. Structure of legal argument and proof. Houston, Tex.: John Marshall Pub. Co., © The book's second purpose is to explain how to take a well-constructed legal argument and present it, in writing, in a way that legal decision makers will find persuasive.

The centerpiece of Legal Argument: The Structure and Language of Effective Advocacy is a step-by-step method, based on the construction of syllogisms, designed to walk the Cited by: 5. ISBN: OCLC Number: Notes: Includes index. Description: xxvii, pages ; 23 cm: Contents: 1.

Inference, argument and fallacy in law The hypothesis: proving facts at trial The syllogism: how legal rules are stated and applied Applying and creating rules by analogy Probability and possibility in legal proof.

Argumentation theory, or argumentation, is the interdisciplinary study of how conclusions can be reached through logical reasoning; that is, claims based, soundly or not, on includes the arts and sciences of civil debate, dialogue, conversation, and studies rules of inference, logic, and procedural rules in both artificial and real world settings.

Each type of legal argument has a different structure and draws upon different evidence of what the law is. Thus this book does not merely introduce readers to law and legal reasoning, but shows how the five different legal arguments are constructed so that various Cited by: 5.

Inspired by the legal domain, our model includes burden of proof as a key element, indicating the level of support that must be achieved by a particular side to an argument. Burden of proof acts. The book's second purpose is structure of legal argument and proof book explain how to take a well-constructed legal argument and present it, in writing, in a way that legal decision makers will find persuasive.

The centerpiece of the book is a step-by-step method, based on the construction of syllogisms, designed to walk the advocate through the process by which a winning argument Cited by: 5. The purpose of Legal Argumentation and Evidence is to provide a new method.

for analyzing the structure of legal reasoning used in arguing a case and evaluating. legal argumentation in general. This book is intended to be of interest to. those who work in the legal profession, as well as to those who teach law, but.

it is not a legal : Douglas Walton. Building on that foundation, The book offers complete coverage of how to form a legal argument and how to write an effective legal memorandum.

the Fifth Edition preserves the features that earned the book its loyal following: comprehensive coverage of writing an office memo, a motion 5/5(4).

a given type of argument that is often reasonable can sometimes be used fallaciously. The approach to argument analysis presented in this book makes the assessment of any argument turn on three factors.

The first factor is the structure of the reasoning on which the argument is based. Three kinds. Understanding the epistemology of witness testimony is tremendously important for the law. In any legal order, a significant degree of factual accuracy is a necessary condition for just legal judgments, and witness testimony (whether in oral or written form) provides a major -- indeed, often the most important -- class of evidence on which such judgments depend.

The new edition of this highly successful text remains grounded in the premise that legal reasoning and legal writing are learned better when they are taught together.

Building on that foundation, The book offers complete coverage of how to form a legal argument and how to write an effective legal memorandum.

the Fifth Edition preserves the features that earned the book its loyal following. Every argument in logic has a structure, and every argument can be described in terms of this structure. Argument: any group of propositions of which one is claimed to follow logically from the others. In logic, the normal sense of "argument," such as my neighbor yelling to me about my trashcans is not termed "an argument" in logic.

Now, suppose you’re facing a deductive argument. If the argument is invalid, then it’s a bad argument: it’s an argument that is intended to give conclusive support for it’s conclusion, but fails to do so. Game over. Think of a student sitting in a mathematics exam and making a crucial mistake in a proof.

proof paradigm to help them structure their arguments.” Legal writing students can use this geometric proof paradigm to help them structure their arguments. First, the “given”section parallels the earlier section of the memo that establishes the relevant case facts and the applicable rule.2 The “given”section that precedes the two File Size: KB.

1 This argument is a personal composite and amplification of several outlines by Harold W. Hoehner and John D. Grassmick from unpublished class notes in Romans, Dallas Theological Seminary, Spring 2 This was an abhorrent title to the Greek mind, but to the Semitic mind it was a title of honor.

3 He was set apart from birth (Gal. Romans expresses Paul’s realization of. A revision of Neumann's very successful basic legal writing text, this edition continues to give a strong foundation in legal analysis and to writing while refining and further improving the text based on user's responses.

the text focuses on constructing a proof of a conclusion of law and teaches format, style, and grammar alongside the reasoning skills. Legal argument: the structure and language of effective advocacy / James A. Gardner p. ISBN (perfect bound) 1. Trial practice—United States. Communication in law—United States.

Title. KFG28 ’75—dc22 Cited by: 5. What is an Argument. •In popular usage, an argument means: an angry dispute between 2 or more people-a row, bust up, etc.

•Argument can thus have an emotional charge •In academic usage, an argument isfrom the Latin arguere (to prove)-a reason for or against an idea, theory, thesis, etc. -a reason given for making a decision. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Legal Reasoning and Legal Writing: Structure, Strategy, and Style by Richard K.

Neumann (, Paperback, Revised) at the best online prices at eBay. Free shipping for many products!. Although the structure of an opening statement will depend on the particulars of the case, the jurors, and your individual style, there is a general outline that can help you start off with a clear, organized, and -- most importantly -- persuasive opening statement.

In general, your opening statement on the plaintiff's behalf should consist of.1. What is argument? - Basically, argument is a claim defended with reasons. It is composed of a group of statements with one or more statements (premises) supporting another statement (conclusion).

2. What is statement? - A sentence declaring something that can be true or false. 3. What is argument in Critical Thinking? - In Critical Thinking, argument.Most legal writing textbooks explain that in the “A” section of the IRAC (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion) paradigm, the analysis or argument section, the writer should apply the law to Author: Mary Dunnewold.